A Growing ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Affluence and Hardship Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in England.
Within a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents occupy properties just several yards from their more affluent counterparts in the adjacent Scartho. One 1.8-metre-high barricade literally divides the two areas in the town of Grimsby, blocking off paths and streets that once connected them.
“This is the divide between rich and poor,” said a resident, 37. “It’s been like this for as long as I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Analysis of government statistics reveals the extent of disparity often exists, at times over little more than a short distance of tarmac, a hedge row or a wall. Decades of budget cuts and lack of funding mean almost two-thirds of local authorities now contain a locality classified as one of the most deprived in the nation.
This spread of deprivation has coincided with a sharp rise in the number of locations where deprived and well-off people end up living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the poorest areas bordered one of the wealthiest. This number rose to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Does More Than Separate Land
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the UK and starkly apparent. The wall transcends being just a metaphorical division; it causes tangible problems for daily routines.
- The school commute that should take a quarter of an hour turn into an sixty-minute detour.
- Reaching important services like grocery stores, schools and employment centres is made more difficult.
- The area often sees vandalism and loitering, with instances of rubbish being thrown over the wall and related problems.
“People strive to maintain a well-kept home and garden, and then you reside facing that,” noted one resident, gesturing towards the rusted barricade.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At a local community centre, workers stress that need transcends postcodes. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your personal struggles,” said director a community leader.
Regardless of ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and feeling of community among its residents. By contrast, Scartho ranks among the most prosperous 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This phenomenon is repeated nationally. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the 10% most deprived of areas in England. It is closely bordered by spacious houses built in the 2000s that sit in the top 10% for job prospects and living environment.
“They may possess bigger houses, but here there’s more community,” commented Phil Hockley, aged 63. “You’ll probably find many people over there never even talk to each other.”
The financial gap is evident: an typical three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while on the other side equivalent homes go for about £410,000.
Residents describe a tangible feeling of being overlooked. “Our neighbourhood is neglected,” said resident Susan. “Over here our facilities have slowly been taken away, and the majority of the issues we face here are to do with poverty.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a picture of an increasingly segregated society, where prosperity and need are frequently uncomfortably close neighbours.