🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic negotiations with the United States on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the US government. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Route

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a position of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states employed their privilege to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations resume.

Trump last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from the United States either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be settled by military means. He said the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Remains the Final Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently tried to impose their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the ultimate resolution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and respect, they will get a response in the same tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if destroyed, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this invasion."